World

Senator Owie Slams 10th Senate: Akpoti-Uduaghan’s Suspension Threatens Legislative Integrity

Share
Share

Former Senate Chief Whip Rowland Owie has dropped a bombshell, warning that the 10th Senate’s suspension of Senator Natasha Akpoti-Uduaghan (PDP, Kogi Central) on March 06, 2025, risks torching its own credibility. “We’re not in a Banana Republic,” Owie thundered, condemning the six-month ban as legislative impunity that could haunt the Upper Chamber. “A senator’s mandate can’t be arbitrarily denied—suspended or not,” he said, urging caution to preserve the Senate’s integrity.

The saga erupted on February 20, 2025, when Akpoti-Uduaghan protested a seat reassignment by Senate President Godswill Akpabio, sparking a firestorm that escalated with her live-TV sexual harassment allegations against him. Her initial petition was stonewalled, but after resubmitting, it landed with the Ethics Committee. Citing a Federal High Court order barring the probe, she refused to appear—yet the Senate plowed ahead, suspending her despite the legal restraint. Owie called it a travesty: “Thorough investigations, not carpet-sweeping, are the standard. Akpabio should’ve stepped down for impartiality.”

Akpoti-Uduaghan, defiant, labeled the suspension “unjust” and a betrayal of “natural justice, fairness, and equity.” She vowed, “This illegal act doesn’t strip my legitimacy—I’ll serve Kogi Central till 2027 and beyond.” Her resolve echoes across X, where supporters hail her as a victim of silencing, while detractors—like Afe Annang, Akpabio’s kin—demand her recall, decrying her “unfit” conduct.

  Assam Assembly election dates to be announced prioritising cultural festivals

Owie’s critique lands amid a cacophony of voices. Atiku Abubakar slammed the move as an “attack on affirmative action,” Peter Obi called it “disappointing,” and PDP’s Timothy Osadolor branded it “shameful,” accusing opposition senators of cowering to Akpabio. Legal experts, pointing to the defied court order, deem it unconstitutional. Yet Afe Annang defends Akpabio, framing the harassment claim—now in litigation—as a political hit job. “No senator should defame our son,” they insist.

X is a war zone. “The 10th Senate’s sinking itself,” one user posted, echoing Owie’s warning. Another quipped, “Natasha’s a rebel with a cause—Akpabio’s crew just proved her point.” The ex-chief whip’s call for due process cuts through the noise: “If issues arise, investigate fully—don’t bury them.” He sees a Senate teetering on self-destruction, with Akpoti-Uduaghan’s fate as a litmus test.

This isn’t just about a seat or a suspension—it’s a showdown over power, gender, and justice. Owie’s plea for integrity clashes with Afe Annang’s loyalty to Akpabio, while Akpoti-Uduaghan’s defiance fuels a broader debate: Is the Senate upholding democracy or undermining it? Legal battles loom, and the court’s role hangs in the balance. On X, opinions fly—some see a martyr, others a troublemaker—but Owie’s warning rings clear: a Senate that flouts process risks losing its soul. As Akpoti-Uduaghan fights on, Nigeria watches a chamber at war with itself, and the stakes couldn’t be higher.

Share
Written by
QncNews

Covering Entertainment, Politics, World News, Sport News, Crimes, Conflict, Metro, Economy & Business News

15 Comments

  • I disagree with Senator Owies criticism. Akpoti-Uduaghans suspension was necessary to maintain discipline and uphold legislative integrity.

  • I think Senator Owie makes valid points about the 10th Senates integrity. Akpoti-Uduaghans suspension sets a concerning precedent.

  • I agree with Senator Owie. Akpoti-Uduaghans suspension sets a dangerous precedent for legislative integrity. Its a slippery slope.

  • I disagree with Senator Owies criticism of the 10th Senate. Akpoti-Uduaghans suspension was necessary for maintaining legislative integrity.

  • I think Senator Owies criticism of the 10th Senate is valid. Akpoti-Uduaghans suspension does raise concerns about legislative integrity.

  • Senator Owies criticism of the 10th Senate raises valid concerns about legislative integrity. Do you agree with his views?

  • Senator Owie makes valid points. Akpoti-Uduaghans suspension sets a dangerous precedent. Legislative integrity is at stake. Whats your take?

  • I think Senator Owie raises valid points about the 10th Senates integrity. Akpoti-Uduaghans suspension indeed raises concerns. What do you all think?

  • Senator Owies criticism of the 10th Senate is valid. The suspension of Akpoti-Uduaghan does raise concerns about legislative integrity.

  • I disagree with Senator Owies criticism of the 10th Senate. Every lawmaker has a right to express their opinion without facing suspension.

  • I disagree with Senator Owies criticism of the 10th Senate. Akpoti-Uduaghans suspension shows a commitment to upholding legislative integrity.

  • I think Senator Owie makes some valid points about preserving legislative integrity. Akpoti-Uduaghans suspension raises concerns. What do you all think?

  • I disagree with Senator Owies criticism of the 10th Senate. Akpoti-Uduaghans suspension was necessary to uphold legislative integrity.

  • I cant believe Senator Owies criticism of the 10th Senate! Do you think Akpoti-Uduaghans suspension really threatens legislative integrity?

Leave a Reply to Kenneth Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *