World

Milei’s Promise to Reject Funding for Argentine Public Hospitals Could Lead to Midterm Backlash

Share
Share

Argentine President Javier Milei’s decision to veto increased funding for public hospitals has led to significant public discontent, potentially jeopardizing his political standing ahead of the October 2025 midterm elections. While he has succeeded in reducing inflation to below 30% annually, his stringent public spending cuts have strained the healthcare system, particularly affecting the Garrahan Children’s Hospital in Buenos Aires.

The Garrahan hospital, known for its pediatric care, has seen a 10% reduction in staff this year. Although the opposition-controlled Congress approved an additional $98 million for health funding, Milei intends to veto this measure to uphold fiscal discipline. This decision has elicited widespread disapproval, with polls showing that 68% of Argentines oppose the veto. Additionally, confidence in Milei’s administration has waned, with his approval ratings dropping below 40% for the first time since taking office.

  European Parliament Delays Vote on Reviving EU US Trade Agreement

Despite a proposed 10% budget increase for Garrahan in 2025, it falls short of the projected inflation rate of 27.3%, leading to difficulties in maintaining quality care. Staff reductions and wage erosion have pushed many healthcare workers to seek better-paying positions in the private sector. Critics argue that these funding cuts disproportionately impact lower-income citizens, nearly 40% of whom depend on public healthcare services.

The government’s healthcare funding policies have become a critical issue as the midterm elections approach. Voters are closely monitoring how Milei’s fiscal strategies affect essential services like healthcare. The outcome of the elections could significantly shape the administration’s ability to enforce its economic agenda and address growing public concerns regarding healthcare accessibility and quality.

Share
Written by
QncNews

Covering Entertainment, Politics, World News, Sport News, Crimes, Conflict, Metro, Economy & Business News

9 Comments

  • I think Mileis stance on public hospital funding could stir up some serious debate. Will it backfire or gain support? Time will tell!

  • I dont get why Milei would reject funding for hospitals. Isnt healthcare a basic need? Seems like a risky move.

  • I think Mileis stance on rejecting funding for public hospitals is short-sighted. Health care shouldnt be a political pawn.

  • Wow, Milei is really playing with fire here! Rejecting funding for public hospitals could seriously backfire in the midterms. Bold move or big mistake?

  • I cant believe Milei would cut funding for public hospitals! Thats a recipe for disaster. Peoples health should come first.

  • I dont know about you guys, but rejecting funding for public hospitals sounds pretty risky. Could this decision backfire in the upcoming midterm elections?

  • I cant believe Milei is risking public health funding! This could seriously backfire. Whats he thinking? Its a recipe for disaster.

  • Wow, Milei rejecting funding for hospitals? Could this backfire in the midterms? Its like playing political Russian roulette.

  • I think Mileis stance on public hospital funding is risky. It could backfire in the midterm elections. What do you guys think?

Leave a Reply to Catherine Melendez Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *