World

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit Against President Tinubu, Imposes N5 Million Fine

Share
Share

The Supreme has dismissed a suit to remove President from office, describing it as frivolous. In a unanimous ruling delivered by a -member panel, led by Justice Uwani Musa Abba-Aji, the court also imposed a fine of N5 million on the plaintiff, Chief Ambrose Owuru, the 2019 presidential candidate of the Hope Democratic Party (HDP).

The court sternly warned its registry not to entertain any further frivolous filings from Owuru. The plaintiff’s suit alleged that President Tinubu was unfit for office, claiming he was an agent of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and citing past allegations of forfeiture related to a in the States.

Owuru also sought the disqualification of Tinubu under section 157 of the 1999 Constitution and demanded to be declared the rightful winner of the 2019 presidential election. He claimed his mandate had been usurped by President Muhammadu Buhari and sought his immediate swearing-in as Nigeria’s president.

  Somalia confronts diphtheria outbreak amid vaccine shortages and aid reductions

A of Legal

This is not the first time Owuru has pursued legal against sitting presidents. His political party, HDP, was deregistered by the Independent National Electoral (INEC), and his claims of winning a 2019 remain unsubstantiated.

Owuru’s petition against Buhari in 2019 was dismissed by the Supreme Court to what he described as a “mix-” in hearing dates. Following Tinubu’s election in 2023, Owuru unsuccessfully attempted to halt the swearing-in of the then President-elect.

Supreme Court Rebukes Plaintiff

During Monday’s hearing, Owuru represented himself in court but was instructed to remove his lawyer’s wig and gown before addressing the panel. The justices criticized his decision to refile a case that had already been dismissed .

  Ukrainian President Zelenskyy meets with President Trump and European leaders at the White House to discuss security guarantees

Justice Abba-Aji expressed disappointment in Owuru, stating his actions were unbecoming of a lawyer with over 40 years of experience. The panel also threatened to refer him to the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary (LPDC) for possible sanctions.

Previous Fines for Frivolous Suits

This is not the first financial penalty imposed on Owuru. In May 2023, the Court of Appeal fined him N40 million for filing another baseless suit aimed at stopping Tinubu’s .

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s ruling underscores its commitment to addressing frivolous litigation and ensuring that the judicial process is not abused. While Owuru maintains his claims, the repeated dismissal of his cases reflects a lack of legal merit. For now, President Tinubu’s position remains secure, with the judiciary signaling its unwillingness to entertain further baseless challenges.

Share
Written by
QncNews

Covering Entertainment, Politics, World News, Sport News, Crimes, Conflict, Metro, Economy & Business News

14 Comments

  • Wow, cant believe the Supreme Court dismissed that suit! Tinubu getting off easy with just a 5 million fine? Something fishy going on here.

  • I think the Supreme Courts decision was biased. Why should President Tinubu get off so easily? Justice should be blind.

  • I cant believe the Supreme Court fined the plaintiff! Shouldnt people have the right to challenge authority without fear of punishment? #FreedomOfSpeech

  • Cant believe they dismissed the suit against Tinubu! N5 million fine is outrageous. Justice system needs a revamp. #UnfairDecision

  • I think the Supreme Courts decision was biased! Tinubu shouldnt get away with everything just because of his status. Justice should be blind for everyone.

  • I cant believe they fined him! Shouldnt we be encouraging people to hold leaders accountable? This feels like a step back.

  • I think the Supreme Court was too harsh with that fine! Shouldnt freedom of speech protect even frivolous suits? #ControversialOpinion

    • Freedom of speech isnt a free pass for irresponsible behavior. Consequences are necessary. #RespectAccountability

  • I cant believe they fined the plaintiff! Seems like a way to silence dissent. What about freedom of speech?

  • I cant believe they fined the plaintiff! What happened to free speech? This is a slippery slope. #NotCool #FreedomOfExpression

  • I cant believe they fined the plaintiff! Shouldnt everyone have the right to challenge authority without fear of punishment? #FreedomOfSpeech

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles
World

Somalia confronts diphtheria outbreak amid vaccine shortages and aid reductions

Somalia is grappling with a significant surge in diphtheria cases, with over...

PoliticsWorld

Ukrainian President Zelenskyy meets with President Trump and European leaders at the White House to discuss security guarantees

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy met with U.S. President Donald Trump at the...

EconomyWorld

UK Cancels Additional Border Checks on Animal Imports Ahead of EU Deal

The United Kingdom has announced the suspension of planned additional border checks...

World

U.S. Cancels Scheduled Trade Talks with India Amid Tariff Dispute

The United States has canceled scheduled trade talks with India that were...