World

Supreme Court Dismisses Suit Against President Tinubu, Imposes N5 Million Fine

Share
Share

The Supreme Court has dismissed a suit seeking to remove President Bola Tinubu from office, describing it as frivolous. In a unanimous ruling delivered by a five-member panel, led by Justice Uwani Musa Abba-Aji, the court also imposed a fine of N5 million on the plaintiff, Chief Ambrose Owuru, the 2019 presidential candidate of the Hope Democratic Party (HDP).

The court sternly warned its registry not to entertain any further frivolous filings from Owuru. The plaintiff’s suit alleged that President Tinubu was unfit for office, claiming he was an agent of the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and citing past allegations of financial forfeiture related to a drug case in the United States.

Owuru also sought the disqualification of Tinubu under section 157 of the 1999 Constitution and demanded to be declared the rightful winner of the 2019 presidential election. He claimed his mandate had been usurped by former President Muhammadu Buhari and sought his immediate swearing-in as Nigeria’s president.

  UN Approves New Troop Deployment to Combat Gang Violence in Haiti

A History of Legal Challenges

This is not the first time Owuru has pursued legal action against sitting presidents. His political party, HDP, was deregistered by the Independent National Electoral Commission (INEC), and his claims of winning a 2019 referendum remain unsubstantiated.

Owuru’s petition against Buhari in 2019 was dismissed by the Supreme Court due to what he described as a “mix-up” in hearing dates. Following Tinubu’s election in 2023, Owuru unsuccessfully attempted to halt the swearing-in of the then President-elect.

Supreme Court Rebukes Plaintiff

During Monday’s hearing, Owuru represented himself in court but was instructed to remove his lawyer’s wig and gown before addressing the panel. The justices criticized his decision to refile a case that had already been dismissed multiple times.

  Zelensky Alerts of Urgent Crisis at Nuclear Facility Amid Power Failure

Justice Abba-Aji expressed disappointment in Owuru, stating his actions were unbecoming of a lawyer with over 40 years of experience. The panel also threatened to refer him to the Legal Practitioners Disciplinary Committee (LPDC) for possible sanctions.

Previous Fines for Frivolous Suits

This is not the first financial penalty imposed on Owuru. In May 2023, the Court of Appeal fined him N40 million for filing another baseless suit aimed at stopping Tinubu’s inauguration.

Conclusion

The Supreme Court’s ruling underscores its commitment to addressing frivolous litigation and ensuring that the judicial process is not abused. While Owuru maintains his claims, the repeated dismissal of his cases reflects a lack of legal merit. For now, President Tinubu’s position remains secure, with the judiciary signaling its unwillingness to entertain further baseless challenges.

Share
Written by
QncNews

Covering Entertainment, Politics, World News, Sport News, Crimes, Conflict, Metro, Economy & Business News

14 Comments

  • Wow, cant believe the Supreme Court dismissed that suit! Tinubu getting off easy with just a 5 million fine? Something fishy going on here.

  • I think the Supreme Courts decision was biased. Why should President Tinubu get off so easily? Justice should be blind.

  • I cant believe the Supreme Court fined the plaintiff! Shouldnt people have the right to challenge authority without fear of punishment? #FreedomOfSpeech

  • Cant believe they dismissed the suit against Tinubu! N5 million fine is outrageous. Justice system needs a revamp. #UnfairDecision

  • I think the Supreme Courts decision was biased! Tinubu shouldnt get away with everything just because of his status. Justice should be blind for everyone.

  • I cant believe they fined him! Shouldnt we be encouraging people to hold leaders accountable? This feels like a step back.

  • I think the Supreme Court was too harsh with that fine! Shouldnt freedom of speech protect even frivolous suits? #ControversialOpinion

    • Freedom of speech isnt a free pass for irresponsible behavior. Consequences are necessary. #RespectAccountability

  • I cant believe they fined the plaintiff! Seems like a way to silence dissent. What about freedom of speech?

  • I cant believe they fined the plaintiff! What happened to free speech? This is a slippery slope. #NotCool #FreedomOfExpression

  • I cant believe they fined the plaintiff! Shouldnt everyone have the right to challenge authority without fear of punishment? #FreedomOfSpeech

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Articles
World

EU Leader Claims Russia is Conducting a ‘Gray Zone Campaign’ and Europe Must Respond to the Challenge

European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen has warned of Russia’s escalating...

SportWorld

Angel Reese set to become the first professional athlete in Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show history.

Angel Reese, a standout player for the Chicago Sky in the WNBA,...

World

South African opposition chief Julius Malema convicted on firearm charges.

South African opposition leader Julius Malema has been found guilty of violating...

World

Trump urges Israel to halt Gaza bombings as Hamas agrees to free Israeli hostages and engage in peace negotiations.

President Donald Trump ordered Israel to halt its bombing campaign in Gaza...