Abia North Senator, Orji Uzor Kalu, has reiterated his support for a single six-year term for presidents and state governors, arguing that such a system would reduce governance costs and promote rapid development. Kalu, the former governor of Abia State, explained that the current structure of two four-year terms is costly and distracts officials from their governance duties.
Speaking on Channels Television’s Politics Today program, Kalu highlighted that the focus on re-election often prevents politicians from prioritizing their responsibilities. He noted that during his tenure as governor, he had already advocated for a single six-year term. He recalled that his stance led to disagreements with then-President Obasanjo. According to Kalu, the continuous emphasis on re-election detracts from effective governance, as officials concentrate more on securing another term rather than delivering on their mandates.
He said, “When you become a governor or a president, their eyes are on re-election. They are not even thinking about what people will do or what people will get. Every politician is looking for re-election. So, the only way to solve this problem is by giving no incentive to anybody, doing one term of six years. It will go a long way in boosting performance because most people think they need to make money for re-election.”
Kalu also addressed the emoluments of senators, which he believes are insufficient for their responsibilities. He emphasized that senators are often criticized unfairly for their earnings and allowances. The senator clarified that contrary to allegations, there are no official vehicles provided for senators, only for committees. He added that while some senators received aid to buy vehicles, he did not benefit from this.
Dismissing claims that the Senate under Godswill Akpabio is merely a rubber-stamp for the Executive, Kalu explained that much of the criticism surrounding senators’ remuneration and benefits is unfounded. “I am in the Senate, and a lot of things are said about the Senators. I sit there quietly and watch, and most of these things are not true,” he stated.
Kalu further disclosed that he earns N14 million monthly, which covers all expenses, including his salary, staff salaries, constituency upkeep, and operational costs. He explained that senators are often approached by constituents in need of assistance, such as paying for medical bills or school fees, and their earnings are used to address these needs. “From this money, I have to buy fuel to move to my constituency, I have to maintain my constituency offices, I have to sit in the constituency, etc. It is not enough,” he concluded.
Kalu also suggested that the government cut back on unnecessary expenses, including foreign aid and contributions to regional institutions, to manage the country’s economy better.
I totally disagree with Orji Kalus idea of a single six-year term for presidents and governors. What about accountability and the power of choice?
I disagree with Orji Kalus proposal for a single six-year term. Leaders need accountability and the chance for re-election.
I dont agree with Orji Kalus idea of a single six-year term for presidents and governors. What about accountability and the power of choice?
I dont agree with Kalus single six-year term idea. What if a leader is doing great? Lets keep things flexible.
I dont see the point of a single six-year term. What if a leader is doing great? Lets stick with two terms.
I dont agree with Orji Kalus single six-year term proposal. Two terms allow for accountability and progress tracking.
I dont agree with Orji Kalu on the single six-year term idea. Two terms allow for accountability and continuity.
Single six-year term can prevent corruption and power abuse. Orji Kalus idea has its merits.
I totally disagree with Kalu! Whats the point of democracy if we limit terms? Let the people decide!
Term limits prevent abuse of power. Democracy thrives with fresh perspectives. Kalus view is shortsighted.
I think Orji Kalus idea of a single six-year term for presidents and governors is intriguing. It could prevent power abuse.
I think Orji Kalus idea for a single six-year term for presidents and governors could actually help reduce corruption in politics.
I strongly disagree with Kalus proposal for a single six-year term. It undermines democratic processes and accountability. Lets stick with the current system!
I disagree with Orji Kalus single six-year term proposal. Two terms allow for accountability and the opportunity for leaders to learn from their mistakes.
I disagree with Orji Kalus proposal for a single six-year term for presidents and governors. What about accountability and the power of re-election?
Accountability is key. Re-election keeps leaders in check. Kalus proposal undermines this balance.
I think Orji Kalus proposal for a single six-year term for presidents and governors is worth considering. It could bring stability and focus to governance.
I dont know about this single six-year term idea. What if they turn out to be terrible leaders? Lets stick with the current system.
I disagree with Orji Kalus proposal for a single six-year term for presidents and governors. Stability is important, but what about accountability and the power of reelection?
I disagree with Orji Kalus single six-year term proposal. What about accountability? Two terms allow for evaluation and improvement.
I disagree with Orji Kalus idea of a single 6-year term for presidents. What about accountability and effectiveness? Lets discuss!
Accountability is vital. One term could lead to unchecked power. Lets keep the debate going!
I dont agree with Orji Kalus idea of a single six-year term for presidents and governors. Two terms allow for accountability and continuity.
One term can breed complacency and corruption. Change is needed for progress.
I disagree with Orji Kalus proposal for a single six-year term for presidents and governors. What about accountability and the power of re-election?
I disagree with Orji Kalus idea of a single six-year term. Stability is important, but accountability could suffer. Lets discuss!
I totally disagree with Orji Kalus idea of a single six-year term for leaders. What about accountability and the power of choice?
I agree with Orji Kalu. A single term can promote focus on governance over re-election.
I disagree with Orji Kalus proposal for a single six-year term for presidents and governors. Two terms allow for accountability and continuity.
I totally disagree with Orji Kalus idea of a single six-year term for presidents and governors. How about we focus on more pressing issues first?
Agreed, lets prioritize fixing current problems before considering drastic changes like that.
I dont agree with Kalus single six-year term proposal. We need checks and balances, not extended power in the hands of one leader.