In a recent commentary, Chief Dele Momodu’s comparison of President Bola Tinubu to General Sani Abacha and labeling him a dictator has generated widespread debate. Observers argue that such assertions display cognitive dissonance and undermine constructive political discourse.
While many respect Dele for his decades-long engagement in journalism and politics, critics suggest he needs a pause from continuous political commentary to reassess his perspectives and regain clarity. His recent remarks on Channels TV were seen as uncharitable, disrespectful to the President, Vice President, ministers, senators, and newly-appointed ambassadors, and dismissive of the intelligence of the Nigerian populace.
The focus has now shifted to the state of the African Democratic Congress, ADC, which Dele leads. Political analysts describe the party as underprepared for national competition. Comparisons have been drawn to a poorly equipped vessel lacking direction, resources, and capacity to navigate the complexities of Nigerian politics. Experts urge the ADC to prioritize rebuilding its structure, strengthening its membership, and crafting a coherent opposition platform ahead of the 2027 elections.
Critics maintain that the influx of Nigerians into the ruling APC reflects the population’s assessment of viable alternatives. The ADC, in its current form, is seen as a collection of ambitious individuals without a unified vision or the organizational discipline required to challenge the ruling party effectively.
The public discourse underscores the need for opposition parties to move beyond rhetoric, focus on strategic planning, and offer credible governance alternatives. Meanwhile, supporters of the APC highlight the perceived achievements of President Tinubu’s administration, emphasizing continuity, ility, and national development.
Dele Momodu is being encouraged to rethink his approach, engage in constructive political participation, and distance himself from narratives that could erode the party’s credibility, advocating for measured commentary that prioritizes the collective national interest.
Leave a comment