Dele Farotimi Denies Seeking Intervention in Afe Babalola Defamation Case

Human rights lawyer and activist, Dele Farotimi, has firmly denied asking anyone to plead with Senior Advocate of Nigeria, Afe Babalola, regarding the ongoing defamation lawsuit filed against him. The case stems from Farotimi’s book, Nigeria and Its Criminal Justice System, which led to the trial currently underway in Ekiti State.

Recent reports speculated that Labour Party‘s 2023 presidential candidate, Peter Obi, had visited Afe Babalola to intercede on Farotimi’s behalf. However, during a prison visit, Farotimi unequivocally dismissed such claims. Speaking through his lawyer, Tope Temokun, he clarified his stance and expressed disappointment at any suggestion that he sought an apology or out-of-court settlement.

Temokun shared details of his conversation with Farotimi:

“I visited Mr. Dele Farotimi at the correctional facility in Ado-Ekiti to address the confusion surrounding recent events, particularly the visit of Mr. Peter Obi to Aare Afe Babalola and subsequently to Mr. Farotimi himself. The narrative circulating implied that conditions for release, apologies, or settlements were being negotiated. I asked him directly about this, seeking clarity on his position and message.”

Farotimi’s response was unambiguous:

“He told me that anyone familiar with his principles and philosophy should know that he would never ask anyone to plead on his behalf in a matter involving his published work. He expressed disappointment in anyone who might believe otherwise, including myself as part of his legal team.”

Farotimi reiterated his unwavering commitment to his beliefs and refused to compromise his principles, even in the face of legal challenges.

The controversy began following the publication of Farotimi’s book, which critiques Nigeria’s criminal justice system. Afe Babalola’s petition alleges that the content defamed his character, prompting the ongoing legal proceedings. Farotimi’s refusal to seek reconciliation underscores his steadfastness in defending the integrity of his work.

While Peter Obi’s visits to both Farotimi and Afe Babalola have raised questions, Farotimi insists he has no involvement in any efforts to broker peace. His legal team remains focused on addressing the case through judicial processes.

Farotimi’s firm stance highlights his dedication to his convictions, refusing to bend under pressure or seek resolutions that could compromise his principles. As the case progresses, his resolve serves as a reminder of his commitment to justice and freedom of expression.